B2 · LEARN THROUGH PRACTICE
Clear ideas.
Thoughtful choices.
Try a real task. Practice with support. Use what you learn in a new situation.
Your goal
Explain where two accounts agree, differ or answer different questions.
Need support? Use Earlier-level support. You can review one skill while continuing here.
1. Pre-check: keep a first attempt
Read the source at the start of Step 2, then try the task below before opening answers, language help or a model. Keep your first response and note the date and help used.
Write a comparative summary and a question both writers could help answer. Explain a possible compromise without claiming it is agreed.
2. Presentation: read and notice
A librarian values a quiet room for concentration and worries that discussion groups will disturb readers. She asks for predictable quiet periods. A conversation volunteer values the room for people with little space at home. He proposes advertised discussion times and quiet use at others. Neither supplies visitor counts or noise measurements. Both want the room to remain useful. Their priorities may require coordination rather than a choice between community and reading.
Language in use — open after your first attempt
- Attribute views in terms their authors could recognize.
- Do not turn an emphasis into rejection of another need.
- Connect perspectives with both, whereas and however.
3. Practice: understand the meaning
What do both value?
A useful room serving people.
Where could they agree?
Predictable quiet periods and advertised discussion times.
What is missing?
Visitor patterns and evidence about disturbance.
Listen for meaning
Listen before opening the transcript. For practice, listen once for the main point and again for details. Record replays or slower playback with your result.
Listen in American English
Audio uses an American English voice available on your device. Pause and Stop appear when a session starts.
The librarian wants predictable quiet periods. The volunteer wants clearly advertised discussion times. They may be able to share the same room. We need visitor information before treating this as a choice between reading and community.
- Where might the views fit together?
- What is still needed?
Transcript — open after listening
The librarian wants predictable quiet periods. The volunteer wants clearly advertised discussion times. They may be able to share the same room. We need visitor information before treating this as a choice between reading and community.
Listening answers and reasons
A schedule with quiet and discussion periods. Visitor/use information.
If you read the transcript before answering, record that as supported practice rather than an independent listening check.
4. Production: create your own response
Write a comparative summary and a question both writers could help answer. Explain a possible compromise without claiming it is agreed.
Try before opening the example. If you work alone, speak aloud or record on your device. With a partner, ask one real follow-up question and respond without reading a script.
A compact model — compare meaning, not exact wording
Both writers value the room, but emphasize different uses. The librarian wants reliable quiet; the volunteer wants scheduled conversation for people with limited space. These aims may fit together if times are predictable. Before setting a schedule, the center could ask when visitors need quiet and observe current use. That is a proposal, not a settled agreement.
This example shows the main communication moves. Your wording and conclusion may differ when supported by the facts. For a project with several outputs, use it as a starting structure and complete every output requested.
Four-part self-check
Use 0–3 for each area. Not tried yet is separate from 0. Judge this task, not your whole English level. Do not convert these scores into an exam score or certificate.
Task completion
- 0 — The required communication is not yet achieved.
- 1 — Some relevant work is done, but key requirements are missing or inaccurate.
- 2 — The response achieves this goal: Explain where two accounts agree, differ or answer different questions.
- 3 — It achieves the goal clearly and handles relevant detail or follow-up without inventing facts.
Clear meaning and organization
- 0 — The main message cannot yet be understood.
- 1 — The reader or listener needs substantial help to connect the ideas.
- 2 — The response is understandable and organized for the task.
- 3 — Structure and emphasis make the reasoning or action easy to follow.
Fit for the situation and interaction
- 0 — The response does not address the audience or situation.
- 1 — Some choices fit, but tone, attribution or response causes confusion.
- 2 — The response suits the audience and handles the other view or question fairly.
- 3 — It adapts effectively, clarifies limits and helps communication move forward.
Language range and control
- 0 — There is not enough relevant language to communicate the meaning.
- 1 — Limited words or errors obscure important information.
- 2 — Suitable comparisons, concessions, conditions and appropriately limited claims communicate the main meaning; errors do not usually block it.
- 3 — Those resources are chosen effectively and controlled well for this task.
5. Post-check: use a fresh situation
One writer values printed guides for offline access. Another values digital guides for enlarged text and updates. Both want clear information. Compare them without inventing opposition.
Use the same amount of help as before. Complete the task before opening the checking guide. Score the new response against the same goal and rubric.
Checking guide — more than one response can work
Represent both access needs. Ask about format availability and updating. Emphasis on one format does not prove rejection of the other.
Review and return
Keep: date, task, help used, listening answers, four rubric judgments, a phrase supporting each judgment, and one next step. A longer response is not automatically a better one. After about a week, try another situation with changed details without copying the model.
Next: Unit 6: Write a Practical Proposal
Return to B2 home or Check Your Progress. Answers are not submitted or saved by this page. If audio is unavailable, use reading support and leave listening unassessed.
Guided speaking: answer one question at a time
Answer about the situation or your own response in this unit. Each question stops for your answer. Take as long as you need, then choose Continue. Pause also works while you are thinking; Resume replays that question. This page does not record or upload your voice.
Guided spoken practice
Audio uses an American English voice available on your device. Pause and Stop appear when a session starts.
Where do the writers agree?
How do their priorities differ?
What question could help them coordinate a workable plan?
Read the speaking prompts
- Where do the writers agree?
- How do their priorities differ?
- What question could help them coordinate a workable plan?
