IELTS Daily Practice Set 1
Part 1: Reading
Passage:
Urban farming has gained traction as a response to food security concerns in densely populated cities. By utilizing rooftops, vacant lots, and vertical structures, this practice reduces reliance on rural agriculture, thereby mitigating carbon emissions from transportation. Cities like Singapore and New York have pioneered initiatives that not only provide fresher produce but also foster community cohesion. For instance, Singapore’s vertical farms use hydroponics, a soil-less method that optimizes water usage. However, skeptics contend that urban farming’s limited scale and high initial costs hinder its ability to meet global food demands. Moreover, the reliance on technology raises concerns about accessibility in less affluent regions.
1. What is one benefit of urban farming mentioned in the passage?
2. Urban farming can fully meet global food demands.
3. Singapore’s urban farms use more water than traditional farms.
4. Complete the sentence: Urban farming reduces reliance on ______ agriculture.
5. Match the heading to the passage: “Urban farming’s limitations”
Part 2: Listening
Instructions: Imagine listening to this 1-minute audio transcript: “Urban farming is transforming cities. It cuts transportation costs, saving up to 20% on food logistics, and promotes local sustainability. In London, rooftop gardens have increased by 15% since 2020. However, it requires significant investment.” Answer the questions below.
6. How much can urban farming save on food logistics?
7. By what percentage have rooftop gardens in London increased since 2020?
Part 3: Writing (Task 1)
Task: The bar chart below shows the percentage of urban farming initiatives in three cities in 2022: Singapore (40%), New York (30%), London (20%). Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features. Write at least 150 words.
Note: Type your response below. Click “Show Sample Answer” for a model response.
Word count: 0
The bar chart illustrates the proportion of urban farming initiatives across three cities in 2022. Singapore leads with the highest percentage at 40%, followed by New York at 30%, and London with the lowest at 20%. This indicates that Singapore has the most significant adoption of urban farming among the three, nearly double that of London. New York’s figure, while lower than Singapore’s, still reflects a substantial commitment to this practice. The data suggests a varying degree of emphasis on urban agriculture, with Singapore prioritizing it most prominently, possibly due to its limited land availability and focus on sustainability. In contrast, London’s lower percentage might reflect greater reliance on traditional farming or space constraints. Overall, the chart highlights a trend toward urban farming, with Singapore setting a notable example.
(Word count: 152)
Part 4: Writing (Task 2)
Task: Some people believe urban farming is the future of food production, while others argue it cannot meet global needs. Discuss both views and give your opinion. Write at least 250 words.
Note: Type your response below. Click “Show Sample Answer” for a model response.
Word count: 0
Urban farming has sparked debate about its potential as a future food production method. Proponents argue it offers a sustainable solution, particularly in cities where space is scarce. By growing food locally on rooftops or vertical farms, it reduces transportation costs and carbon emissions, ensuring fresher produce. Cities like Singapore demonstrate its viability, using advanced techniques like hydroponics to maximize output. Advocates also highlight its role in fostering community resilience and reducing reliance on rural agriculture, especially as urbanization accelerates.
Conversely, critics assert that urban farming cannot meet global food demands. Its limited scale—constrained by available urban space—makes it impractical for feeding billions. High startup costs, including technology and infrastructure, further limit its reach, particularly in developing regions. Traditional agriculture, with its vast land and established systems, remains essential for mass production, they argue. Moreover, urban farming’s reliance on energy-intensive methods raises sustainability concerns.
In my opinion, urban farming is a valuable supplement rather than a complete replacement. It excels in enhancing local food security and sustainability but lacks the capacity to address global needs alone. A hybrid approach, integrating urban and rural methods, could balance innovation with scale. Thus, while urban farming is a promising step forward, it should complement, not supplant, traditional practices.
(Word count: 251)
Part 5: Speaking
Task: Answer the question: “Do you think urban farming is practical in your city? Why or why not?” Speak for 1–2 minutes. Click “Start Timer” to begin, and record yourself using a phone or device.
Time remaining: 2:00
Tip: Practice fluency and coherence. Example points: space availability, climate, community interest.
Discover more from EDUCATION FOR PEACE FOUNDATION
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
